Difference between revisions of "Extrusion Edge Cases"
(initial sections) |
(→Problem issues) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=== Coincident Spine Points === | === Coincident Spine Points === | ||
| + | |||
| + | So, extrusions. A spine and a cross-section. An algorithm to build a spine-aligned cross-section plane (SCP) at every point of the spine. Here's where the questions start. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Under "Special cases", there's a line: "If two points are coincident, they both have the same SCP." That means to me that coincident spine points are legal under the spec. The potential for that renders some statements from the previous portion of the spec potentially ill defined. Specifically: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. The algorithm for generating Y for the SCP is ill defined if three spine points in a row are coincident. In the spirit of the spec, reusing the last value of Y makes sense, but the spec doesn't say so. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. The algorithm for generating Y for the SCP at the first point of an open spine is ill defined if the first two spine points are coincident. Similarly, one may employ look-ahead to the first non-null spine segment, but the spec doesn't say so. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. The wording for generating the first (and only) SCP for collinear spines is unclear; specifically, "rotation along the axis" is a funny notion. I can imagine a translation along the axis and a rotation around an axis, but not a "rotation along something". Here's how I understand it: you calculate a rotation that takes the vector (0,1,0) to the spine direction vector (the first nonnull spine segment), then you apply the same rotation to the vector (0,0,1), and that's the Z for the SCP. Notably, that's *not* how the popular X3DOM implementation treats those cases. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4. If the above interpretation is right, the algorithm is ill defined if the spine goes in the negative Y direction. The rotation between (0,1,0) and (0,-1,0) is not uniquely defined, and the resultant SCP Z can be anywhere in the XZ plane. | ||
== Possible solutions == | == Possible solutions == | ||
Revision as of 16:18, 28 October 2015
The Extrusion node specification has ambiguities [1]
This wiki page supports discussion on the x3d-public mailing list regarding Extrusion specification edge cases that make consistent modeling difficult.
Contents
Problem issues
Coincident Spine Points
So, extrusions. A spine and a cross-section. An algorithm to build a spine-aligned cross-section plane (SCP) at every point of the spine. Here's where the questions start.
Under "Special cases", there's a line: "If two points are coincident, they both have the same SCP." That means to me that coincident spine points are legal under the spec. The potential for that renders some statements from the previous portion of the spec potentially ill defined. Specifically:
1. The algorithm for generating Y for the SCP is ill defined if three spine points in a row are coincident. In the spirit of the spec, reusing the last value of Y makes sense, but the spec doesn't say so.
2. The algorithm for generating Y for the SCP at the first point of an open spine is ill defined if the first two spine points are coincident. Similarly, one may employ look-ahead to the first non-null spine segment, but the spec doesn't say so.
3. The wording for generating the first (and only) SCP for collinear spines is unclear; specifically, "rotation along the axis" is a funny notion. I can imagine a translation along the axis and a rotation around an axis, but not a "rotation along something". Here's how I understand it: you calculate a rotation that takes the vector (0,1,0) to the spine direction vector (the first nonnull spine segment), then you apply the same rotation to the vector (0,0,1), and that's the Z for the SCP. Notably, that's *not* how the popular X3DOM implementation treats those cases.
4. If the above interpretation is right, the algorithm is ill defined if the spine goes in the negative Y direction. The rotation between (0,1,0) and (0,-1,0) is not uniquely defined, and the resultant SCP Z can be anywhere in the XZ plane.
